Retired infantry officer. Conservative by nature and politics; Happily married and father and grandfather of eight. Loves V8 powered Range Rovers, Golden Retrievers, good books and technology and think there should be open season on Greenies. Born in the mid forties and overdue for servicing but most parts still work.

Women in the front line

women

Pic from News.com.au

Mate, says my mate Jack, can you imagine having women in our bunkers? Don’t put the hexy stove there – it should go in the corner here and for God’s sake clean up your mess…tidy up your spent rounds…No! try the hexy stove in the other corner….God you stink – at least try and keep yourself clean..and…and

Jack, of course is joking, but Combet isn’t as he pushes the subject and I can only begin to imagine those behind him pushing as well. Women libbers, gender equality at any price ideologues and other assorted left wing ‘divorced from reality’ nutters.

I wrote on this very subject four years ago. Obviously I had more time on my hands then but the comments are an interesting overview of the debate.

The subject is cyclic, comes up every few years and so is service in Infantry. The Roman Centurion carried similar weights to what I carried in Vietnam and the soldiers in Afghanistan, and I’ve met a lot recently, are still struggling with a 100 lb plus pack. If their mate is wounded they then have to carry him and his gear in a ‘fireman’s carry’ as well for short distances so treble that for short bursts.

But then it isn’t all physical, although that fact alone would stop most women successfully finishing infantry and special ops courses. It’s the whole physcological and social considerations that make me wary.

Bob Baldwin who is Shadow Minister for Defence Science, Personnel and the Assisting Shadow Minister for Defence said psychological aspects of battle made the frontline unsuitable for women.

“The coalition believes in the equality of opportunity for women in the defence force,” he told reporters today.

“The coalition, however, doesn’t agree with the placement of women into forces such as the SAS, clearance divers, commandos or frontline combat engineers.”

Fair enough too!

But Labor MP Yvette D’Ath said the issue of serving on the frontline should be “irrespective” of gender.

“I’m very strong on equality and basis on who can do the job,” she told reporters.

“If you can pass the course, you can meet all the criteria, you should be allowed to perform that job irrespective of what that job is.”

Which totally ignores the social and physcological aspects of women in combat.

My local Priest nails it in letters to The Australian today;

AS well as being dangerous and impractical in many cases, the push to put women on the front lines would erode something valuable in our civilised society. It would diminish the dignity and special status of women as life-givers and nurturers (“Now is the time for our women as well”, Editorial, 10/9).

Women wielding machine-guns and bayonets as the aggressors in war seems to defy the natural law. While I’m all for equal pay and equal opportunities in education and the professions, sending women to the front lines in the name of equality diminishes rather than enhances their status.

While nobody is forcing them to go now, it would be a different matter in the event of conscription or a ballot if we faced a major war. Young women and the hard-boiled feminists who claim to have their interests at heart in supporting this move should consider such implications carefully.

Father Tim Norris
St Kevin’s Parish, Geebung, Qld

In Vietnam I did a forty day patrol; that is forty days without stopping in a safe base like Nui Dat. Think about that – in the dry season there was insufficient water to wash so no showers, no body wash for forty days!. Gave up on wearing socks and jocks (can’t carry or resupply) and a bout of dysentery didn’t help. Defecating and urinating publicly without any privacy. Blood and bits of enemy flesh on my filthy uniform, skin diseased and abraded from thorns and the prickly heat making every step painful. And then there’s the enemy.

Do you want your daughter there? I don’t and Yvette D’Ath would have vomited if she ever got downwind of me.

You see, us conservative chaps think women and kids need protecting and they are harder to protect when they’re close by and how the hell are they going to nurture the next generation if they’re in the combat zone.

As Father Tim says;

…sending women to the front lines in the name of equality diminishes rather than enhances their status.

I’m happy for girls to do most things military but I want them protected from the filth, terror and mind boggling physical and physcological aspects of infantry service.

I’ve been there but I see no combat infantry service in the CVs of people advocating that women should be able to join me.

Keep the home fires burning sweetheart and hopefully I’ll be back soon.

Queue jumpers saved from their own stupidity

AFGHAN refugees struggling in the ocean in the aftermath of an explosion aboard their vessel off Ashmore reef in April this year were allegedly kicked and fended off by Australian Defence Force members as they tried to climb aboard inflatable rescue boats.

I think it will become apparent that the refugee queue jumpers put themselves in the water in the first place and secondly, the commander needs to get his crew back on board first to effect rescue of the others. If a sailor had drowned there would’ve been hell to pay.

Described as ‘inhumane’ and ‘distressing’ by ‘sources’ who would most probably call anything less than an instant four bedroom house and a grand a week from the government as ‘inhumane’ I am less than moved by the story.

Bottom line; those that could be saved were in circumstances that threatened the lives of ADF personnel and the Afghans are now safe on land.

I’m back

For the last six months I’ve been working full time on a Regimental Reunion. The reunion was over four days at Twin Towns Services Club at Tweed and culminating in 740 of us sitting down to dinner. The event was successful and now I get my life back.

As part of the reunion we invited some new generation soldiers from all rank grades recently back from Afghanistan and if there has ever been any doubt in your mind about the quality of our troops then rest easy. Meeting them buoyed and enthused me…they are, simply put, quality and the Regiment is in good hands.

Man bursts into flames after Taser strike in Western Australia

Darwin’s Natural Selection in action;

A MAN from a remote western desert community was last night being airlifted to a Perth hospital after he was shot by police with a Taser gun and engulfed in flames.

His sister, Morinda West, said Mr Mitchell was sniffing petrol in his mother’s house when police banged on the door and asked him to come out.

He eventually decided to leave and went to the front of the house with a lighter and a two-litre orange juice container full of petrol, she said.

“He must have put petrol on his face, then the policeman shot him with the Taser, that’s when the flames happened,” she said.

A police spokeswoman said a male police officer fired the Taser when Mr Mitchell ran at police with the petrol container and refused to stop when asked.

Petrol on your face and in your airways, 50,000 volts arcing across your face and body…..that’ll do it.

People who are against everything I think is reasonable want the issue of Tasers stopped. Seems silly to me – this fool might survive setting his face on fire but he wouldn’t have survived two 9mm rounds from a Glock pistol fired into the centre of the seen mass and that’s the only other option the policeman would have had.

Just picture it – brain damaged loser carrying 2 litres of petrol and a lighter approaching fast in a menacing manner.

Bang! bang!

Bye bye!

Drawing a very long bow

As a side issue of the incarceration of Australia Stern Hu by the Chinese government I’ve come across commentators who are somewhat confused.

This from Leigh Sales on Lateline

LEIGH SALES: Well Dr Southcott, isn’t it a bit rich for the Coalition to be so exercised about this matter when the Coalition left David Hicks at Guantanamo Bay for two years without charge and for five years without a completed trial?

Excuse me!

For the life of me I can’t imagine why Dr Southcott didn’t just mention the fact that Hicks was a terrorist and Hu is a businessman and there is no way known that anyone could draw a parallel between the two cases.

Except if you work for the ABC;

or write for The Australian for that matter.

Jack the insider raises the issue as well. He raises some reasonable points, as he usually does, but also opines that the Libs shouldn’t push Rudd to do something about Hu because they left Hicks languishing in a cell at Guantanamo for almost three years.

Hicks should still be in the pokey somewhere but I am not so sure about Hu but either way you’d have to draw a very long bow to connect the two in any shape manner or form.

Bloody Hetero Matelots

sailors

Pic courtesy of the ABC

Sailors are in trouble for being sailors.

FEDERAL Sex Discrimination Commissioner Elizabeth Broderick has defended the navy against suggestions it cultivates demeaning attitudes towards women.

Ms Broderick’s comments followed revelations sailors aboard the HMAS Success offered financial rewards to crew members who slept with female sailors.

Revelations! Wow this must be serious

Yesterday, the navy confirmed four crew members from the Success were sent home from Singapore in May as a result of the allegations.

The sailors had reportedly compiled a book, titled The Ledger, detailing financial rewards for male crewmen who slept with female sailors.

Sailors who slept with female officers or lesbians stood to gain more money, according to the reports. The book was apparently discovered by crew and the captain was alerted.

Yesterday the Chief of Navy, Vice Admiral Russ Crane, said the navy would not tolerate the sort of behaviour the four were alleged to have engaged in.

Chief of Navy! How the hell did he get involved. Admittedly it’s a bit tacky but that’s it. It should have been handled in house and the media should have had the manners to leave it alone.

Now the PM is involved

Reports of a sex betting ring on board a Navy ship are disturbing, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd says.

I agree – it’s almost as disturbing as public figures frequenting strip clubs and drinking too much to remember the event next day. At least there is no report of the sailors paying the ladies for their services unlike that on offer at the venue Rudd visited.

Vegans get it wrong

PEOPLE who live on vegetarian diets have slightly weaker bones than their meat-eating counterparts, researchers said yesterday.

A joint Australian-Vietnamese study of links between the bones and diet of more than 2700 people found that vegetarians had bones 5 per cent less dense than meat-eaters, lead researcher Tuan Nguyen said.

The issue was most pronounced in vegans, who excluded all animal products from their diet and whose bones were 6 per cent weaker, he said.

I wouldn’t be surprised if they had less neurons as well.

Vale MJ

The Sunday Mail devotes the first nine pages and a ten page insert to the life and death of a weird, grotesque looking negro singer. Sure he had some good music in his day but that was more than negated by his weird behavior in his latter years.

The following comment, picked up from a US blog could well be his epitaph

Only in America can a Negro boy grow up to be a white woman.

Mark Steyn pretty well nails it for me.

Liar, liar – pants on fire

The original article that started it all

Rudd’s diversionary tactics are to concentrate the populations attention on the existance or not of the email that Gordon Grech referred to before his superior’s shut him down.  He must be very sure it doesn’t exist but that still doesn’t explain Grech’s testimony and Martines attempts to shout it down.

The Age quotes Kevin Rudd;

“What is at stake in this entire debate is the integrity of Mr Turnbull and his core claim that at my request, my office made representations to the Treasury on behalf of Mr John Grant.

“Who supplied the contents of this fake email to the Opposition? Who in the Liberal Party has read this fake email? What did they do with it after they read it?”

What a deplorable defence.  Accuse your accuser of the same type of offence. It’s not a ‘fake email’ yet and its unlikely anyone supplied the Opposition with a copy.  They are simply quoting the outcome of the Senate hearing.

Sheer blather!

The issue is much deeper than that.  Swan has clearly mislead the house (lied) and Rudd has most probably done the same.

Considering Swan says he hardly knew Grant it beggars belief that he would then aproach Ozcar, requesting personal attention be paid to Grant’s case without Rudd telling him to. And why would Ken Henry take an interest in one of what must be hundreds, even thousands of applications for assistance without a good reason – like the PM told him to as well.

A series of emails that emerged on Friday as a result of intense questioning of Treasury officials by the Opposition in Senate estimates hearings revealed:

  •  Mr Grant’s case was handled personally by staffers in Mr Swan’s office and by senior Treasury officials;
  •  Mr Swan was kept informed of the progress of the case, including via his home fax; and
  •  Treasury head Dr Ken Henry was also kept in the email loop as to how Mr Grant’s application was being treated.

Despite all this, Swan is on record as saying Grant did not get any special treatment.

I watched the video of Grech being interviewed and two things stick in my mind.  First, Grech acted like he had explosive information that he believed to be true but felt if he mentioned it his career was terminated.  Secondly, Martine, the man sitting along side Grech, acted like he too knew the truth and was going to do everything in his power to stop Grech uttering it.  He pulled rank on Gretch and refused to let him answer a simple yes-no question three times.  In effect he took over the chair of the Senate hearing from the Senators – that’s how important it was to him to keep the info under wraps.

In a sense, Rudd’s  diversionary tactic is working.  It gives the ABC a decent spin to make Turnbull’s resignation the issue and lets the tabloid TV say something without having to think about it.

By 7:30 Sunday evening Ch 7 News lead is “Turnbull has only hours to go before he must resign”. No mention of the original accusations. Like there wasn’t a collection of emails and faxes proving Swan had mislead the house and that the video of  Grech’s testimony never happened.

My take on the episode is that Rudd did tell people to look after Grant and that Swan, possibly Henry, but definitely Grech, did as they were told.  I’d imagine it has been a very bad weekend for all concerned but I have no sympathy for those who abuse power and then lie in the House about it.  I have plenty of sympathy for Grech and hope he has covered his arse and survives.

The eventual outcome might be that no one resigns but one thing is for sure; the voters perception of Rudd’s ethics has been severely damaged.

UPDATE: I listened to the debate in the House and saw Rudd on TDT and the bulk of the questions have not been answered.  The email mentioned by Grech may or may not be a forgery.  One found on his computer at home appears to be, but no one has stated categorically (that I have read or heard) that it is the one he was referring to at the hearing.  When the AFP says it is so in a formal report then I’ll believe it

On TDT Rudd states the entire fracas is based on a forgery.  No it isn’t – the entire case does not rest on one email.  The emails and faxes of emails involving Swan have yet to be answered satisfactorily.  The ALP don’t want to talk about them of course but they will be raised again. If the email from Rudd’s office is a forgery then either another email once existed where Rudd communicated his wishes or it was made plain by some by other means.  I simply don’t believe that Grant didn’t get preferential treatment.

All in all though, the ALP have handled it rather well, but then when TDT is prepared to give the PM 5:40 minutes free time to put his case and no right of reply for the Opposition then they should be doing well.

The TDT talking head tried to pin Rudd down on Swan but he just repeated his “Swan is doing a wonderful job” line.

I hope that’s not the end of it – I look forward to tomorrow’s developments with baited breath.

1 81 82 83 84 85 229