Correct me if I’m wrong or being cynical but surely the only purpose is to drain votes off the Greens Drew Hutton and the Dems What’shis face?

If I’m wrong please tell me. I’m sure someone will.

But if I’m correct and it works, well and good.

UPDATE: Graham at Ambit Gambit has more

The more the radical unions are shown on TV, the more the voting public can see what a vote for Latham means.

Maritime workers giving away $10,000 notes handed out in Martin Place as union launches ?funny money?

The MUA will launch its own election campaign in Martin Place, Sydney midday tomorrow by giving away money.

Branch Secretary Robert Coombs said he’d watched the Howard Govt buying votes with tax cuts and pork barreling, so the union thought they would hand out money too.

And the ALP isn’t buying votes with tax cuts?

Meanwhile;

Watching the ABC show Seven Wonders of the Highways on ‘Big’ tourist attractions like the Big Pineapple and the Big Guitar.

A guy is talking about a big Oyster that never actually got off the ground.

Why not?

Well I went to the Bank Manager and we were talking about how hard business was with the ‘Recession we had to have’ and the bank manager told me I was paying 25% interest on my loan

Yep. 25%.

I’m surprised it got past the ABC ‘Must Make Howard look Bad’ censorship rules. Fancy letting any mention of Labour interest rates get through to broadcast. That’s actual Labour interest rates – not Latham’s promised ‘we will keep ’em low if we ever work it out’ type rates. It is the rates that happen after the left wing Politicians and Union Reps front up and call in their markers from Caucus.

Labour’s only defence against the woman who phoned a Perth station and pointed out an anomoly in their maths – dare I say a lie – is that she is a paid up member of the Liberal Party.

She is stll right though.

Latham, I see your one Liberal member getting some airtime and raise you literally hundreds of ABC and SBS TV and radio staff and half the journalists in the press – all paid up or wannabe Labour members.

You have to give us some airtime.

Wayne Swan shouts into the wind;

Labor’s family and community services spokesman Wayne Swan continued to reject the Poor family’s claims, saying they should not be taking into account the Coalition’s $600-a-year welfare bonus when this may not continue.”

If Wayne can get away with saying that then I can say Latham’s Tax Plan may not continue, or if he gets into power he will add all Private Schools to his ‘Hit List’. It’s the same assumption based on an unheralded event.

Get over it Labour – the $600 payout exists and you can’t just wish it away.

You got it wrong.

What else?

I thought Latham presented well and would even give him a slight edge in the debate. Of course, the audience giving it to Latham 67 to 33 says more about the audience than it does about Latham so I’ll just wait and see how the election campaign develops.

Let the ALP followers have their day in the sunshine – winters coming.

With voters starting to get the measure of Latham and finding him short in a lot of areas the call to bring the troops home now! is starting up again. It’s a good ploy from the ALP’s point of view. The left will love it because it might make the Coalition look weak and hopefully, make Bush look bad, but it wouldn?t serve any other purpose.

Chris Shiels thinks it’s the answer;

…..there is only one possible response, and that is for Latham to now get right on the front foot, assume his best John Curtin persona, and demand the troops be brought home from Iraq so that our best defence assets are all focused and available for redeployment on the real front line in the ‘war on terror’, our own region.

Go read the post – there are some interesting comments from readers.

A couple of points

Our presence in Iraq is miniscule but important politically. We currently have
the following ADF assets and personnel in theatre;

# HMAS Adelaide with about 240 sailors,
#A RAAF C130 det of two aircraft and about 150 airmen,
# RAAF AP-3C Orion det of two aircraft and about 160 airmen,
#6 RAAF Air traffic controllers,
#A security det with about 120 troops and ASLAV vehicle protecting Australian interests, and
# about 80 training team type people.

That is about 900 troops from a 100,000 troop defence force. It only leaves enough troops in Australia to wipe Indonesia off the face of the earth several times. (No – I’m not suggesting we do that – it’s just an analogy)

Not to denigrate these ADF personnel currently in Iraq in any way but I can assure you that the hole they leave in our defence is likewise miniscule.

Secondly – who says the front line of terrorism is here? The motivation, money and training for terrorists is sourced much further a field than our back door.

It’s in the Middle East.

It’s the old Fortress mentality from the eighties. The idea of defending Australia by holding all troops and assets in-country, flies in the face of thousands of years of military experience. It simply doesn’t work. The battle must be taken to the enemy and we must be the ones to choose the battle zone – not them.

The Fortress mentality was linked to a ?warning time? of seven years. Sorry, it doesn?t happen that way. Labour couldn?t see it then and won?t see it now. Using the excuse that we had seven years warning before anyone could attack us allowed the ALP to downgrade our Infantry Corps from six to four battalions after Whitlam had already downgraded it from nine to six. They then had the temerity to state, with a straight face, that the reserves would pick up the slack! Not knocking our reservists but that little theory depended on upgrading manpower, equipment and training in the Reserves ? didn?t happen to any great degree. It certainly wasn?t enough for them to pick up the slack left by professional infantrymen.

I was in the Operational Deployment Force at Townsville then and the ALP didn?t even understand logistics. We had enough reserve ammo for one good firefight ? we joked about sharpening our machetes for when the ammo run out.

Labour and defence?yeah right!

The only way to defeat any enemy is to attack their homeland. Cut off the head and the body withers. Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Afghanistan ? take your pick but to sit at home in the trenches and wait for the enemy to come over the horizon is something only an academic would suggest

To me, this leaves the bring the troops home now! mantra as just that – a pointless utterance. It appeases the terrorists and will allow them to say – see, we have forced the infidel Australians to withdraw from our land with just three men and a bomb in Indonesia…see how weak they really are.

Bringing troops home now is appeasement. The fact that we don’t actually have many there is not the point. Terrorists will see it as a victory.

The assume his best John Curtin persona call is weak. It brings up images of a threatened homeland in different times. With Australian Divisions in the Middle East at the time and Japan rolling down South East Asia it was the only call for Curtin to make.

It is nothing like that now. We don’t have a major part of our defence force overseas and JI isn’t threatening to invade our homeland with an Army. Given good intelligence, clear orders and free rein, an infantry rifle company could round up JI

Tim Dunlop pitches in, agreeing with Chris Shiels and says;

The idea that we would somehow be less safe under a Labor government is unsustainable, and to their credit, at least since the Embassy bombing, no member of government has said this.

You are wrong, Tim. With a Labour government in power, the left wing will more than likely get their wish and the troops will be rushed home.

Appeasement…look how weak Australia is…see how the Coalition is falling apart…Spain, Philippines, the US next – giving life support to terrorists.

Anyway, it doesn?t matter how many divisions you have sitting in Townsville or Darwin they cannot impact on three suicide bombers in Jakarta. The only way to do that is to take the Middle East apart and deprive the tentacles of the monster any sustenance.

Recycling the already proven fallacies of appeasement and Fortress Australia won’t help at all.

My local member, Wayne Swan, calls the $600.00 Family tax payment Fool’s Gold and goes onto say;

It’s not real – it disappears. What we’ve put in place is the biggest welfare-to-work package in history

Something else that may disappear is the $1.6 Billion of accrued and future non-resident super payments that is a big part of the ALP’s funding formula. Largely backpacker funded, these backpackers are increasingly likely to claim the money back.

It is, after all, their money and in my travels I meet few backpackers that aren’t money driven. The Tax Office has even started a campaign to remind them the money is there and theirs for the taking and they have until age 65 to claim it.

Now that’s disappearing fool’s gold

Simon Crean makes a long awaited appearance and blows it by stating nine out of ten will be better off. Oops – I mean seven out of ten. The nine or seven isn’t that important but Simon’s credibility stocks, not high to begin with, will suffer as a result of his lie.

By the time the backpackers claim their money it will be?Oops, I mean two out of ten.

Best go back in your hole, Simon

Is someone counting Labour’s lies or has the media placed that subject out of bounds. Although I wouldn’t call the ALP’s mistake a lie, under the ‘Bash Howard’ rules it is. Maybe a collective of “40 prominent Accountants” could write to the press denouncing Latham’s Lies!

Just joking.