Scared to shoot back, British troops feel the stress.

LONDON: British troops in Iraq are suffering levels of battle stress not experienced since World War II, army doctors have warned, because of fears that if they shoot a suspect insurgent, they will face court.

That’s what happens when the government continually caves into the Left-leaning press. What a great bonus for the terrorists. Whenever one of theirs are killed they simply wind up the Western press who agitate for a trial of their own soldiers.

One source said: “There doesn’t appear to be any overt consideration or understanding of the pressures our soldiers are under. The unpopularity of the Iraq war at home and a belief that firing their rifles in virtually any circumstances is likely to see them end up in court are sapping morale.

Imagine, if during WW2 each and every Bomber Command pilot was charged and tried with murder after raids over Germany or Pte Smith on the Kokoda Track was charged because he killed a Jap before reading him his rights. Beggars belief!

The plot thickens with the ‘Piracy’ against the cruise ship Seabourn Spirit now being described as a possible ‘Terrorist” attack.

AN unexploded missile is embedded in an accommodation unit after a possible terrorist attack off the east African coast, Foreign Minister Alexander Downer has said today.

As well as missiles, the pirate/terrorists have RPGs and machineguns in their armoury.

The passengers on the US-owned Seabourn Spirit were woken by machinegun fire and a rocket-propelled grenade crashing into the vessel at dawn on Saturday about 160km off the coast of the lawless nation of Somalia.

My money’s on terrorists. A full armoury suggests an infrastructure that too date, hasn’t been a signature of pirates. UPDATE: Rueters report the missile is actually a rocket propelled grenade (RPG)

An unexploded rocket-propelled grenade remained on a U.S.-owned cruise ship after the vessel escaped an attack by pirates in the Indian Ocean over the weekend, Australia’s foreign minister said on Monday. “An unexploded rocket … is embedded in some of the passenger accommodation of the ship,” said Downer.

It’s actually a grenade but rocket or grenade…whatever, it’s still dangerous.

I note, neither The SMH or The Age can bring themselves to use the word ‘Muslim’ when talking about the riots in Paris. The Australian manages to touch on the subject though.

Crackdowns on Muslim associations in the suburbs, rising unemployment, inequality of access to the top French schools and universities, and the housing crisis that keeps many poor workers in high-rise council estates on the periphery of Paris were all blamed for the rioting.

Maybe lack of education is more to blame for inequality of access to French education and for rising unemployment but that’s not going to be acceptable to the local Clerics. Keep ’em ignorant. Force 12th century ethics, morals and knowledge down their throats. Maintain the rage and envy….hate us for our success based on superior education and separation of powers and the subsequent comforts all this brings. Maintain your disadvantaged status or join the 21st century.

Under the leader Guess who can’t keep a secret? PM in hot water SMH journo’s Marian Wilkinson and Tom Allard attack the PM based on anonymous statements.

The Prime Minister, John Howard, has been accused of jeopardising a year-long operation by state and federal police targeting terrorist suspects in Sydney and Melbourne.

Name them! Until you do the article has the same credibility as every other anonymous criticism. Nil. There exists a balance between keeping the people informed and denying terrorists intelligence but one thing is clear and that is, Howard must tell us if a new threat exists. If he doesn’t and someone dies the public will be rightly angry. If certain people are a threat and ASIO et al have been watching them then they only have to maintain vigilance or aprehend them. They can do that now. As I understand it the exercise in changing the act to to the more general an act allows federal agents to apprehend potential terrorists before they actually select the target. This is not a case of debating the new anti-terror laws, it is simply attacking Howard and it won’t wash with the public. Howard isn’t in hot water, The Fairfax stable is and I don’t wonder why. Sacking editorial staff to better reflect it’s ever decreasing circulation is only the start. They need to get some serious hacks that might better reflect the opinion and concerns of the reading public.