Retired infantry officer. Conservative by nature and politics; Happily married and father and grandfather of eight. Loves V8 powered Range Rovers, Golden Retrievers, good books and technology and think there should be open season on Greenies. Born in the mid forties and overdue for servicing but most parts still work.

Anna only looking after her family

The LNP are sticking to their positive approach to campaigning leaving it up to Anna to delve into the dirt. Without anything to brag about and a lot of reasons to divert voters attention elsewhere, Anna keeps hammering the fact that Newman has entrepreneurs in his extended family. It appears to me that a leader associated with enterprise where people actually earn money by their own efforts and succeed, is a good basis for a government leadership.
One personally-addressed flyer saying “Campbell is only interested in looking after one family and it’s not yours” complete with a photo of Lisa Newman smiling at her husband.
And this from the party that appoints Anna Bligh’s husband, Greg Withers, to a huge salaried sinecure in the Office of Climate Change within DERM. Thus, one could argue that it is also fair to say Anna is only interested in looking after one family and it isn’t yours. Anna’s motivation must be her family. No one could say it’s the state, with debt spiraling out of hand, our AAA credit rating gone and the state paying $100 m a week to service ALP loans. I note the “If Cando doesn’t win who will be the LNP leader?” campaign gained some traction last week but really, If Anna doesn’t win her seat who will be ALP leader, is also a reasonable question. All party leaders have to campaign and win their own seat and it’s no different in Queensland. True, Anna’s chances of holding her seat are better than CanDO winning Ashgrove but the question is simply a distraction. Not long to go now!

Smith simply doesn’t respect the ADF

I started the last post with this: I’ve always maintained that the ALP do not like the ADF. Readers took to me to task and one even abused me as he raced to justify Minister Smith’s latest foray into attacking Defence. My opinion still stands and has been confirmed by this morning’s article in The Age by MAJGEN John Cantwell. Some extracts:
I spent long hours over many sessions briefing the then minister, Joel Fitzgibbon. It was a painful process. Fitzgibbon was out of his depth. He simply didn’t get it. Not only could he not understand what we were trying to tell him, he didn’t put in the time to try to get across his brief. He was an auto-electrician in a suit.
But at least Fitzgibbon occasionally expressed a desire to do the right thing by the service personnel who delivered our military capability. Not so Smith. Reflecting on Smith’s visit to Afghanistan MAJGEN Cantwell recalls;
…the abiding impression I was left with was that he merely tolerated people like me and the troops I commanded. I cast around in my mind for the element that seemed to be missing in his dealings with the men and women of the ADF who I led. Then I had it: respect. Smith had no respect for those who chose to serve in uniform for their country. It was an uncomfortable insight.
He closes with this; I sense that the judgment I formed in 2010 was on the money. There’s no respect, and it works both ways. Read more

ADF vs the Defence Minister and the Media

I’ve always maintained that the ALP do not like the ADF. They hate the officer system and spend most of their time in the treasury benches initiating inquiries that all seem to recommend less money while demanding the same service. As in they are currently demanding a $20 billion savings over then next decade in the defence budget. This current mob appears to have an agenda to denigrate the military in any way they can. I heard on the ABC today that one of Defence Minister Smith’s inquisitions have identified 757 cases of sexual misconduct some of which occurred in the 1950s. The 1950s FFS! Who can remember anything sexual from that far back. I’ve got another one for them. In the 70s whilst the battalion were practicing for a parade the RSM said I looked like a kangaroo dog rooting a marble. I think a lot of the 757 cases will be at about that level.. I did hear old mate Duncan Lewis (now Secretary of Defence), interviewed and he did say some of the cases are serious. I”m sure they are but hey, it looks like we are talking about 60 years of misconduct – that ain’t all that bad. Maybe a standard week at University’s ‘O’ weeks Jack Waterford at the Canberra Times says Diggers need just a little slack;
WAS EVER so much nonsense spoken as when politicians, journalists and feminist and ethnic icons vie with ancient generals, clergymen and academics to condemn the latest evidences that our soldiers, sailors and air persons are profane, cynical and somewhat racist and sexist young men and women?
Read more … As if all this wasn’t bad enough, Defence has been lumbered with Smith as Minister. His opinion of the military and procedural knowledge of same has been clearly shown to be lacking. He sacked Kafer, the Commandant of ADFA despite there being no evidence that he had acted incompetently or had made an error of judgement in the Skype/sex ADFA video. The Smith initiated inquisition found no evidence of incompetence and yet Smith has sat on that report for three months and only now does Kafer get to sit in the Commandants chair at ADFA. Smith doesn’t give up easy though “I remain of the view that this was an error of judgment,” he says even after reading the report that categorically said that Kafer did not make an error of judgement. and this;
Asked if Commodore Kafer had his full confidence, Mr Smith sidestepped the question, saying he had full confidence in Australian Defence Force chief David Hurley and other defence leaders
Tosser! I can promise him that the ADF do not have any confidence in their minister. ….and Smith was mentioned as a potential PM – what is it with these people? UPDATE: Back of the envelope quick calculations by reader Harry Buttle indicate that;
[the ADF] sexual assault figures comes out at 5.3 per month per 80,000 persons, or to put it another way means that as a group, on this particular crime over the last 60 years, the military is in fact more than 5 x more law abiding than society in general. No sexual assault is acceptable, but this looks like another hatchet job.
Read more

Viet Vets in trouble again

Aussie Vietnam Vets have hit the news big time. The final volume of the official history of the Australians in the Vietnam War is about to be released and the entire volume must be about Vietnam Vets and their drinking problem. Google answered vietnam war history+alcohol abuse with 18 million hits. I had to click forward to page 12 before I found someone else other than Aussies having a drinking problem. Our alcohol abuse has been spread across the world and everyone’s talking about it. I’m actually reasonably confident that the final volume mentions matters other than alcohol abuse but someone has obviously seen fit to underline the problem so that the people who abused us then, and still do, can add alcoholism to our sins. It fits seamlessly with shooting and killing the good guys, being US puppets, killing babies, raping women, and all the other communist propaganda inventions. Having these ‘sins’ thrown at us by Aussie uni students during breaks from collecting money for the Viet Cong ammo fund, goes partway to understanding the horrific PTSD roll from the war Doesn’t matter – we’re used to the abuse, or at least we have learned not to take it to heart. Considering most times I got back off patrol the first night in the boozer was effectively a wake I actually don’t care what non-vets think. Five or six cans is binge drinking? Come on…give me a break princess. Five or six cans goes nowhere near putting the black dog back in his kennel. I definitely remember one patrol that lasted a month so there is 30 days of beer I never got. If I came back dirty,stressed and in mourning and consequently had too much to drink and someone from the 142nd Blog Comments Platoon, safe in their clean, neat, safe house finds that is cause to denigrate my service then get out of the debate. I’m not listening anymore.

The Circle in trouble

A hate campaign is being waged against the talking head idiots from the Circle as a result of the brainless comments they made about Cpl Ben Roberts-Smith, VC.
The hate campaign comes as calls build for Stynes to quit the Ten morning show in light of the offensive remarks directed at Corporal Ben Roberts-Smith by Stynes and guest host George Negus last Tuesday.
Good!

Bloody Communists…bloody ABC!

I went down to Gloria Jeans to get a caffeine fix and on the way back the ABC were quoting Lee Rhiannon, resident communist in the Greens. She was prattling on about Bob Carr needing to disclose all his conflicts of interest before he takes up Foreign Affairs. Two points; First: Lee, talk to Bob Brown about conflicts of interest, bring up Graeme Wood’s $1.6m donation to The Greens that turned the ever dangerous lunatics into a third power in politics. Mention the purchase of land from Gunns, Tasmania and Bob’s demanding the ALP not allocate any funding to help Gunns stave of the bid by Wood. Now that’s a conflict of interests. And second: Why is it that the ABC are quoting communists. How does it happen. Does she phone up her fellow travelers in the ABC and arrange air time? Or do the ABC have the Greens and communists on speed dial and phone and ask them to comment? Either way The Greens only represent about 10% of the population, thus air time should be on a similar ratio – not the other way around. Further, considering communists represent about .001% of the electorate we should only hear from Lee about once every three years. Bloody Communists…bloody ABC!

Ray Finkelstein’s review

PRINT and online news will come under direct federal government oversight for the first time under proposals issued last week to create a statutory regulator with the power to prosecute media companies in the courts. Ray Finklestein The historic change to media law would break with tradition by using government funds to replace an industry council that acts on complaints, in a move fiercely opposed by companies as a threat to the freedom of the press. Bloggers and other online authors would also be captured by a regime applying to any news site that gets more than 15,000 hits a year, a benchmark labelled “seriously dopey” by one site operator. Even this tiny part of the cyber-world gets 130,000 hits a month so this site operator also labels the plan “seriously dopey” That’s two of us. And who uses ‘Hits” as a measuring tool these days. No one, and that would suggest the review is seriously misinformed. Ray Finkelstein needs to vet his “expert advice”. Number of visits is a better guide and even then I exceed the yearly mark every month. Talk about a catch-all solution. I look forward to deep and meaningful discussions with the ALP luvvies – I plan to start the negotiations by saying Communications Minister Stephen Conroy is a f###wit. I imagine such profanity would give the Inquisition staff the vapours and have them loose their train of thought. All of the above brought to you by anti-News Corp paranoia based on a newspaper in another country tapping someone’s telephone. If your paranoia is bad enough it will lead you to claim all media with a News Corp connection will do the same and this problem, which doesn’t actually exist, needs regulation. Chris Kenny, in today’s Australian agrees with me;
It traces its genesis, in part, to revelations about the illegal activities of the London tabloids. More disturbingly, the inquiry admits it was established because senior members of the Gillard government and its Green coalition partner believed they were being subjected to jaundiced political coverage. So a government that is struggling has initiated a media inquiry because not all media is as generous towards it as are the ABC and the Fairfax newspapers.
I’ve got a feeling that it wont get up and we will be looking at another episode of tilting at windmills but at the very least, always looking for a positive, it does serve to underline the governments stupidity. God free us of these pests. UPDATE: You should read this piece at Andrew Bolt

Carr wreck imminent

Well knock me over with limp-wristed Leftie – I didn’t see that coming. I thought it was dead and buried but Julia’s ability to confound me has been enhanced. What was “completely untrue” a day or two ago is now “completely true”. The mind boggles. Carr won the battle and he is Foreign Minister Designate (he isn’t in the Senate yet). Gillard thinks she has won as well but I’m not so sure. Malcolm Farr heads the link to his article “Second-hand Carr”which is very apt. I wonder how Smith feels about all this. A happy little sandgroper? Don’t think so. He’ll take one for the team but I can well imagine a feeling of “Aren’t we good enough” will be the thought of the day at Team ALP. The positive is how must Kevin Rudd be feeling at the moment – unloved…angry…replaced by someone he thinks as inferior? I certainly hope so. I want him sniping from now to the election. The second-hand Carr may have a good track record – I don’t really know being a Queenslander but the NSW ALP right seem to love him and that could be a worry. People may tend to think of the appointment as another case of the NSW Right faction running the government. That’s my first thought so I’ll just have to wait and see how it pans out.

Gillard admits she lied

JULIA Gillard has confirmed she held talks with former NSW premier Bob Carr over drafting him to serve in her government, sparking fresh opposition attacks on her honesty and political judgment. The Prime Minister has backed away from her claim that a report in The Australian on Wednesday revealing her dealings with Mr Carr was “completely untrue”, after being challenged by the opposition to repeat her claim in parliament. Of course she won’t do that – it’s a sackable offence so she just sticks to lying to the media The Australian newspaper reported on Wednesday Ms Gillard offered Mr Carr the minister job last week, after Kevin Rudd resigned to contest the Labor leadership and before Senator Mark Arbib announced he would retire from the upper house.
Ms Gillard told reporters in Canberra: “The story that’s on the front page of the Australian newspaper today is completely untrue.”
Time and time again she gets caught out and yet there still are people prepared to vote for her. Amazing!

The politics of envy

In an essay in The Monthly magazine, Mr Swan described the influence of the wealthy few as a “poison” that had “infected our politics and is seeping into our economy”. Wayne, I see your wealthy few and raise you the ACTU $20 million campaign to unseat Howard. The Treasurer accepted that entrepreneurs lifted employment, but said Ms Rinehart, Mr Forrest and Mr Palmer were seeking to wield influence beyond their immediate business interests.
“They are openly seeking to exert an inordinate degree of political power, and I’m highlighting that fact,” he said
So am I.
1 49 50 51 52 53 228