Retired infantry officer. Conservative by nature and politics; Happily married and father and grandfather of eight. Loves V8 powered Range Rovers, Golden Retrievers, good books and technology and think there should be open season on Greenies. Born in the mid forties and overdue for servicing but most parts still work.

Mr 70%

Rudd must be happy with his 70% approval rating as PM but he will also be holding his breath as Australians’ absorb the fact that he tells lies as well. KEVIN Rudd yesterday described how he purposely misled disgraced former West Australian premier Brian Burke to avoid attending a dinner being organised by the influence-peddler. He released emails to prove the point but does not talk of telephone calls that set up his withdrawal for the proposed dinner. The emails were obviously born out of desperation after a staffer or adviser pointed out to Rudd that dinner with a ex convict and king maker would look bad. When the matter was raised last year by Howard, Rudd blustered and told lies;
Mr Rudd said he was unaware of the ban on contact with Mr Burke imposed by then WA premier Geoff Gallop.
Bullshit! Everybody in Australia who reads newspapers was aware of the ban on contact with Brian Burke imposed by Geoff Gallop. You don’t even have to read between the lines to realize Rudd was talking to Burk as part of his plan of ascendancy to the chair he holds today. Also;
Mr Rudd said he had no recollection of discussing the Labor Party leadership with Mr Burke at any time.
Yeah, right! The issue will most probably fade as the media are enjoying the honeymoon just as much as the ALP but some supporters must be feeling a little uneasy. The discerning ones at least. UPDATE:Peter van Onselen writing for the Australian delves deeper.

ALP share the pain

LABOR MPs have just voted in caucus for a 12-month wage freeze for all MPs, to signal that “restraint needs to be shared” to fight inflation.
But it remains unclear whether it will happen if Coalition MPs do not back the plan. MPs’ and senators’ pay is determined by the independent Remuneration Tribunal and is not determined by MPs or parliament. The proposal will now go to the tribunal, with Deputy Prime Minister Julia Gillard to run the “machinery” of the submission process.
Whatever, token symbolism for public consumption or a heart felt and rational decision, it’s reasonable but quiet frankly, Kevin, I’m more concerned about wage freezes for unions. How about it? Are they going to join in the new ALP restraint sharing as well?

Anna Bligh furious

QUEENSLAND PREMIER Anna Bligh has labelled the National Party racist after the state opposition refused to support an apology to the stolen generations made by state parliament nine years ago.
As the nation stopped for Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s speech, Queensland Parliament descended into furious debate when Opposition Leader Lawrence Springborg said the state government should apologise to Aborigines for failing to make inroads into indigenous issues. The opposition also used question time to attack the government on its record on issues such as child safety, including the gang rape of an 10-year-old girl in Aurukun, indigenous infant mortality rates, education and alcoholism.
Left wing Anna doesn’t disappoint – whenever you question a lefty they retort with personal attacks. They never, ever answer the question. I guess I’d be furious too if some inconvenient MP pointed out the obvious truth that Queensland apologised to the Aborigines nine years ago and if anything, their situation is worse post-apology than it was before. Particularly when it was done on the day that the Country was all a flutter about an apology from Canberra.
“What followed this morning was the most graceless and mealy-mouthed excuse to avoid the issue,” Ms Bligh said. “There was an opportunity there to rectify the failure of 1999 and it was comprehensively missed.”
Right, so what she is saying is;
The 1999 apology has failed so what we will do is exactly the same and you’re a racist for not complying.
Makes sense in a lefty sort of way. Bloody Nationals, they demanded actions instead of words – how racist is that.

Sorry’s not enough

Whenever someone had an occasion to apologise to me for some error I would always say” Don’t go on about being sorry for what you did, just tell me what you are going to do to ensure we don’t arrive at this set of circumstances again. When I had to apologise to Army superiors I would, in my more mature years at least, admit to stuffing up and quickly follow up with an outline on what steps I had taken to ensure it wouldn’t happen again. Disarming and constructive. I would like to think Rudd would have done something similar with his apology in the house. If he had spent one paragraph saying sorry and the rest of the ninety minutes outlining what he is going to do to prevent a re-occurrence then there would have been some merit in the occasion. Unfortunately, that didn’t happen happen. It turned into a frenzy of wailing and teeth gnashing with a song and dance act choreographed for TV. I’m also afraid that some of the factors that have lead us to this frenzy will be reestablished in the not to distant future as the left gain ascendancy in the ALP. The Sorry business is being handled poorly. I would want a Task Force, an enlargement or follow up to Mal Brough’s plan, to move into the areas and clean it up in all the interpretations of the word. Swamp the problem – overkill ..gives kids with new medical, health and education degrees HECS payback for one or two years commitment. Call on the Grey Nomads (look at that huge source of experience) Call for volunteers to help – I would put my hand up, but lets not go back to the land rights, sit-down money, isolated outstations, no education, no discipline, access (hide the problems) by permit only, noble warrior bullshit of the Left. As a matter of interest, how are we going to handle the fact that hundreds, if not thousands of kids need to be removed from their dysfunctional families right now – today. Should we set a date in our calendars, say twenty years hence, to apologise to them? And who actually should be apologizing and to whom? David Moore ex chief of staff to former Liberal Aboriginal affairs minister Mal Brough expands on this;
The confusion starts at the top. Last week Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said we needed an apology before we could tackle the problems. But the people to whom he is apologising are a small proportion of the Aboriginal community. The majority weren’t part of the Stolen Generations and they have entrenched problems. The assumption that an apology to the minority will fix the entrenched problems of the majority is misplaced.
David thinks a lot of other people should be apologising and I can’t help but agree with him. Every Premier for not providing infrastructure; every Education Minister for not insisting black kids have an education; every Attorney General for not applying the law equally to all; the Hawke Keating government for handing the problem over to the dysfunctional ATSIC and the Whitlam and Fraser governments for burying the issues in outstations and hiding them with permit-only entry. Not to mention the Left wing academics for screaming every time governments tried to do something constructive and the public service chiefs who allowed the circumstances to exist where abused kids were not removed from dysfunctional families due to fear staff had of being accused of starting another Stolen Generations. Go ahead, have your warm and fuzzy day. You mob in the suburbs who have never been west or north and seen the real problem, roll around in an ecstacy of righteousness but for Christ’s sake, tomorrow, let’s get on with fixing the problem. As an aside, how would you like to be the first person who recommends, post Sorry Day, in the face of overwhelming evidence of child abuse, that a child be removed from the parents care, or lack of it?

9/11 planners for the high jump

THE Pentagon today said it would charge six Guantanamo inmates with 2,973 counts of murder over their role in the September 11 attacks. The suspects include the self-confessed mastermind of the terror attacks, Khalid Sheik Mohammed.
“The defendants will face the possibility of being sentenced to death,” said Brigidier General Thomas Hartmann, a Pentagon legal advisor, announcing the move.
Good!
The CIA admitted publicly for the first time last week, some of his confessions were extracted during sessions when he was subjected to “waterboarding,” a drowning simulation technique widely regarded as torture. Brigidier General Hartmann admitted that the first court battles are likely to focus on the admissibility of such confessions, as well as the legality of the tribunal itself. The tribunal rules have been extensively re-written since the Supreme Court ruled they breached the Geneva Convention and demanded more rights for defendants.
Now we will have the Human Rights (no Responsibility) mob queuing up to prattle on about torture. Some will even demand they be released because they had water poured over their faces and a confession obtained under torture is no confession. Some of these people will be Americans, some Australian, all of whom enjoy the benefits of western civilization while trying to undermine what made it great in the first place. Just make sure they did it and then top the bastards – the terrorists that is. We have to put up with the other bastards.

Mal Brough

I have included a link on the left bar to a speech Mal Brough gave to the Deakin Institute. It paints a terrible picture of the situation that exists in Aborigine settlements and outstations and you should go and read the piece.
It has been our responsibility, as legislators over the last 30 years, starting with sit down money with Gough Whitlam and land rights under the Fraser Government. Those two single things did more to harm indigenous culture and destroy it than any two other legislative instruments ever put into the Parliament. And people look at me and say, land rights. Let me explain. You see, you can be land rich but be absolutely poor in every other way.
I have always argued Land Rights do nothing for the dispossessed. It is often argued that the key to western civilization was the Title Deed. Only when you actually own a piece of land can you value it, borrow on it or just enjoy it. Everything else is dreamtime

Whaling

The Australian now agrees with me on whaling
After a clumsy three-week delay, the Oceanic Viking finally left port on its mission of official government activism, apparently to collect more evidence for what is already well-documented activity, for some future but unspecified legal action against the Japanese Government. International law has to date offered little resolution in this regard. The action appears to have done little more than antagonise Australia’s biggest trading partner at the highest levels and weakened the Government’s ability to act diplomatically and strategically to actually do something about moderating the Japanese whale cull.
and this
The Japanese fleet plans to take about 935 minke whales in the Southern Ocean this season. The IWC estimates there are somewhere between 500,000 and over a million swimming around those parts. As environmentalist Tim Flannery pointed out, you can hardly mount a case against it on sustainability grounds. The managed harvesting of thousands of other equally sentient mammals for food occurs every day in Australia without so much as a murmur.
The country needs to know that the entire anti-whaling operation is based on activists and their agenda. Paul Watson, ‘Captain’ of the Steve Irwin (so named for it’s Australian appeal) is nothing short of a lunatic with an unhealthy hatred for all fisherman. I particularly note this quote from the above link.
When a former Greenpeace colleague criticized Watson for sinking half a fleet of Icelandic whaling boats in 1986, Watson replied, “So what?” he he said. “We did not sink those ships for you or for any of the six billion hominid a–holes on this planet…we could not give a damn what human beings have to say about the actions.” “The world will be a much nicer place without us [humans],” he said on another occasion, adding that he “owed no allegiance to humanity.” This message is incongruous with his assertion that the SSCS is “a vehicle to empower people.
This man has the Australian government dancing to his own sick tune. I do not sit easy with the fact that the government of a country like Australia is acting as a paid up member of a radical organization that terrorizes people going about their legitimate business. The entire affair is very untidy and leaves Australia’s reputation as a reasoned and intelligent player shattered.

Afghanistan

As the ALP always termed Afghanistan as the Good War to distinguish it from Iraq,which, for some unfathomable reason (to me anyway) they classify as the Bad War, one could expect them to support and maybe even raise our troop levels. But I’m starting to think that is an unsafe expectation. Joel Fitzgibbon, our new Defence Minister is busy making demands of NATO that on the face of it will be unmet. Australia isn’t a member of NATO, it only has observer status and whereas the article quotes Fitzgibbon being a tough guy it’s is all about public consumption in Australia. Look how smart we are and look how stupid the Libs were. We are telling NATO how to run things while John Howard just sent the troops in to do the job. I can just see all the NATO nations and HQ Senior staff rushing to do Australia’s bidding. Listen to the brilliance of new guys Rudd and Fitzgibbon….they have the answers we have been looking for…it’s OK, the war is won I’m also a bit concerned that it foretells the ALP reducing our commitment but time will tell. For those interested I have included a list of contributors and relevant strengths as at 6 Feb 08 United States – 15,000 United Kingdom – 7,800 Germany – 3,200 Italy – 2,800 Canada – 2500 Netherlands – 1,650 France – 1,515 Poland – 1,100 Australia – 1,070 Denmark – 780 Spain – 740 Turkey – 675 Romania – 535 Norway – 495 Bulgaria – 420 Belgium – 370 Sweden – 345 Lithuania – 260 Hungary – 230 Croatia – 190 Portugal – 160 Greece – 150 Albania – 140 Czech Republic – 135 Eastonia – 135 Republic of Macedonia – 130 New Zealand – 115 Finland – 105 and Austria, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Iceland, Ireland, Jordan, Luxemburg, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia and Switzerland with less than 100 troops

Sorry business is getting costly

A reader gives an insight into the political make up of the Public Service. She, and all other staff at a Brisbane office have received this email with a pdf attachment from Reconciliation Australia
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd will deliver an apology to the Stolen Generation in Parliament next Wednesday 13 February 2008. This is a significant event in Australia’s history and I encourage you to acknowledge it in your workplace. The apology will be broadcast on ABC television from 7.55am. It is expected to go for approximately 90 minutes. I encourage Managers to allow staff to watch the broadcast if at all possible. In addition you might like to organise a special breakfast, morning tea or other function in your workplace to commemorate this event.
Is this rife across the board, I wonder? Are tens of thousands of government employees going to down pens and keyboards for 90 minutes on Wednesday? Why does Gorge Orwell spring to mind. Did his novel 1984 just miss the mark by 24 years? And what happens if my reader doesn’t join the party or the celebratory morning tea – is she marked down as a racist? Government by symbolism certainly has some converts who think words will help turn back the years of apartheid that came from the H.C.Nugget Coombs/Whitlam days of outstations and noble savages. They need a lot more. Keith Windschuttle suggests the government gives them $50 billion if all of what is claimed is true. That might be tongue-in-cheek but he has other thoughts that are worth reading For myself I am sorry that people think saying sorry is an answer and I wont be sorry when Thursday comes around – maybe Rudd can get on with running the country for all of us instead of just the Greenies and the Aborigines. That is of course, after his 1000 advisors tell him what to do.

He has his mother’s eyes

Japan’s Institute of Cetacean Research denied the whales were mother and calf and accused the Government of misleading the public. ICR director-general Minoru Morimoto said the variance in size was simply “random sampling”. However, a spokesperson for Mr Garrett said he had received independent scientific advice that the whales were, in fact, related. Oh well, that’s different then…….no….hang on, Minister for plastic bags how does that work. Have the people who gave you scientific advice been on board the Japanese whalers and DNA tested the two bodies? No! Then what are they saying? Like mothers the world over…look at him, he has his mothers eyes? Give us a break Garrett!
1 102 103 104 105 106 228