The Latham Diaries

Early December two years ago I said;

If Martin Luther King had a dream, I have nightmare. Latham leading Australia to insignificence via embarrassment. I accept youth , vigour and aggression but the subject has to be house trained first.

Nothing has happened since that day to change my mind.

Latham was so second class I can only imagine most of the decent men in the ALP squirm when they think how they were snowballed into electing Latham as their leader.

His schoolboy utterences when he was leader are now being recycled without the benefit of any external editing. With vitriol in spades he attacks everyone he ever met, but whereas I don’t think the ALP team are winners, at least they are house trained.

A failed experiment, a blot on our history and an embarrassment. The press need to stop giving him oxygen – just let the whirlpool in his own small mind screw him from the scene forever.

Aussies will pay, says bomber

SENTENCED to death for his role in the embassy bombing in Jakarta last year, the terrorist known as Rois had an unrepentant message for Australia.

“All of you will receive heavier punishment than what you have done to me,” he said, smiling, as he was led away by armed police.

We might pay, you will be dead.

UPDATE: Second bomber handed death sentence.

Reader PQ (see comments) is right, of course. There is a long way to go before the sentence is applied. The Indonesians may well reduce the penalty on appeal but at least the courts have shown they are prepared to be tough on terrorism with the initial sentence.

Quotes

From Janet Albrechtsen in todays Australian in an article headed Left unread on the shelf.

They still have not worked out that voters view tired old leftist policies much the same as Edward O. Wilson, an expert on ants, described Marxism:

“Wonderful theory. Wrong species.”

From Mat Price in the Sketch

Ignoring Beazley’s antics, the Treasurer read a blurb from Mark Latham’s forthcoming memoirs, which are said to be less than flattering about his ex-colleagues.

“Maybe you could read it to your children,” Costello suggested to the opposing benches.

Pure Irish Genius

Picked this up reading Samizdata It is very cutting.

As the full horror of Hurricane Katrina sinks in, thousands of desperate columnists are asking if this is the end of George Bush’s presidency. The answer is almost certainly yes, provided that every copy of the US Constitution was destroyed in the storm. Otherwise President Bush will remain in office until noon on January 20th, 2009, as required by the 20th Amendment, after which he is barred from seeking a third term anyway under the 22nd Amendment.

More at Slugger O’Toole

Cats

From Gut Rumbles

A firefighter is working on the engine outside the station when he notices a little girl riding down the sidewalk in a little red wagon with little ladders hung off the sides and a garden hose tightly coiled in the middle. The girl is wearing a firefighter’s helmet. The wagon is being pulled by her dog and her cat. The firefighter walks out to take a closer look. “That sure is a nice fire truck,” he says admiringly. “Thanks, Mister Fireman,” the girl says. The firefighter looks a little closer and notices the girl has tied the wagon to her dog’s collar and to the cat’s testicles. “Little Partner,” the firefighter says, “I don’t want to tell you how to run your rig, but if you were to tie that rope around the cat’s collar, I think you could go faster.” The little girl replies sweetly, “You’re probably right, but then I wouldn’t have a siren.???

David Blackburn
Amarillo, TX.

NZ Airforce sold

Hulun Cluck sells the NZ Airforce Strike Wing to US company for 150 million dollars.

Alice in Wonderland was never weirder.

Money received for the fleet would go towards the cost of regenerating and shipping the aircraft with the remaining $NZ120 million allocated for developing a “modern, relevant Defence Force”, Mr Burton said.

That should buy a few F18 Hornets.

The sale was not an attempt to ensure a strike force could not be revived, he said.

Right!

And there is a chance the Kiwis will vote her back in.

Muslem matters

News.com report a senior Islamic leader in NSW has accused John Howard of trying to oppress Muslims and said new counter-terrorism laws would achieve the aims of terrorists by proxy.

In an angry speech to a summit designed to condemn terrorism and promote harmony between Muslims and non-Muslims Islamic Council of NSW acting chairman Ali Roude does neither;

“If John Howard gets his way, we will not be able to talk about it. We will be tagged and monitored and maybe interned,” he said. “I hate to see someone who is not a Muslim scared of me.”

Then tell them how you dispise the actions of some of your extremist bretheren and they might calm down. You can’t blame any westerners for being wary of a religious group that are providing the world with 100% of it’s terrorists from among it’s adherents.

While Simon Kearney or John Kerin describe Ali’s speach as angry and designed to condemn terrorism and promote harmony between moslems and non-moslems they then go on to report his condemnation of our reaction to terrorism. I don’t think he has either condemned terrorism or promoted harmony.

The summit, controversially held in Sydney on the fourth anniversary of the September 11 terror attacks in the US, condemned terrorism without qualification, saying terrorists were not Muslims.

Saying terrorists are not Muslims is not condemning terrorism without qualification at all – it’s simply denial and what do Simon Kearney or John Kerin see as controversial? The fact that the conference was held in Sydney or that it was held on September 11. I just don’t get their point. I see the location as irrelevent and the timing as opportune.

While Ali says terrorists aren’t Muslims, a representative of an extremist Muslim group, Al-Qaeda, threatens Melbourne

The masked man warned that the attackers would show no compassion.

“Yesterday, London and Madrid. Tomorrow, Los Angeles and Melbourne,” he said.

“We love peace, but peace on our terms.”

I can sort of understand the no passion thing about Melbourne but I don’t like it that we are on their radar again.

Over at Evil Pundit a debate rages over wearing of the Hijab by muslem woman.

I see a woman wearing hijab and I see subjugation – whether she is aware of it or not. Readers at EP compare wearing the hijab with wearing the christian cross and therebye show their confusion. One act is covering up lest men succumb to lust and is enforced in many families. The christian cross is worn as a statement and in my experience is done so by choice and never by direction.

By the same token I don’t think outlawing wearing the hijab is the way to go either. I would think that time and education will see it’s demise.

There are, I’m sure, many young moslem woman who wear the hijab or scarves or clothes that completely cover their form for perceived modesty reasons. Education will change their perception of modesty. I might have thought the first bikini wearing woman as exciting but now hardly ever get distracted by the scenery yet my great-grandfather could well have been driven to uncontrolled lust by the sight of a pretty turned ankle.

Perceptions change and people assimilate after generational change.

Good news from New Orleans

Good news from Bad News Central

AN Australian who was missing in New Orleans “probably had one too many and got loud” before being found safe and well today – in prison.

Tourist Ashley McDonald, of Narre Warren in Melbourne’s south-east, was arrested in New Orleans before Hurricane Katrina hit last week his sister Jasmine Mutnansky said this morning.

Australian Federal Police contacted the family and said: “Good news – he got arrested.”

Good on ya’ son. Hurricane coming…let’s get pissed.

The Blame Game II

Have just been over to Tim Dunlop for my daily does of senseless vitriol. Aussie Bob is in full flight proving once and for all that no amount of facts will ever dissuade him and his kind from blaming Bush or Howard for perceived ills in our society.

Bob writes:

Imagine if Bush had gotten that bull horn of his (surely there’s one on AF-1), or even gone on TV before Katrina and said “Get out now!”. Like, just after the disaster was declared on the Friday before the storm. He’d have been an effing hero. But that was too easy…

No… he went a strummin’.

Well Bob, you can imagine it. In fact you can do more than that, you can actually read about how Bush got on the horn and tried to get the Loiusiana Governor to order an evacuation and call for federal help well before Katrina landed. She stonewalled and that hesitation added to the long list of stuff-ups.

You can read about it Bob but I know you wont so I won’t even post a link. The Blame Game doesn’t have any rules and facts are to be ignored.

Like most western societies there are laid down procedures for the US central government to adhere to prior to sending in the cavalry. The US laws do not allow the Federal government to just send in the troops, to order evacuations or to abitrarily impose Military Law.

The primary responsibility for dealing with emergencies belongs to local and state officials who are charged by law with the management of the crucial first response to disasters. First response should be carried out by local and state emergency personnel under the supervision of the state governor and his emergency operations center.

When the local authorities decide that the emergency is beyond their capabilities then a procedure exists to call for help. This procedure exists in Australia and we in the military call it Aid to the Civil Power. Well, we did in my time, whatever, the proceure will still exist.

I’m not trying to exhonerate the US Federal authorities. On the face of it the system didn’t work with suffient alacrity to match the size of the disaster and I’m sure subsequent investigations will improve on procedures and that, I might add, should be the aim of any investigation. It should not be an avenue for vested interests to allocate blame against their political foe.

Governor Blanco and Mayor Nagi have a lot of explaining to do as well but I note little critical assessment of their involvement in the tragedy outide of blogs.

Has anyone else noticed the presence of USN hospital and logistic ships now providing support in the disaster area and thought to ask themselves how many days sailing did it take to position these ships. I can assure you that ships of this size still have no “Beam me to NO, Scotty” facilities and thus would have had to have been put on notice well before the event.

I imagine this will be ignored along with the fact that even though the US has only 10% of the military in Iraq, detracters still believe that the US involvement in Iraq is part of the reason that troops were slow to get into the area and therefore this can be sheeted home to Bush as well.

Fine – call the federal agencies to task. They are after all, a part of the procedure, but in doing so look to the local agencies in the state and city administration as well. They too are a part of the procedure even if they are Democrats.

New job description for PM

It’s bad enough that Howard is castigated for not giving his undivided attention to the self inflicted troubles of all the Aussie druggies in SE Asia, he is now expected to save individuals from their own folly or misfortune whilst travelling.

The disaster that is Katrina is so huge, so devastating that the US themselves are having trouble tagging tens of thousands of their own citizens without the Australian and other governments barging in and demanding preferential treatment.

A Brisbane woman, Ms Fiona Seidel was caught in the disaster area and allocates blame for her presence and slower than instant excavation.

“I have mixed emotions about John Howard,” Ms Seidel told the Seven Network from the US.

“I’m a good Australian, I pay my taxes, I work, I own a home, I do the right thing, I don’t commit crimes and he pretty much wasn’t there for me when I needed him.”

Nothing mixed about that.

I do however have mixed feelings about MS Seidel.

The report says she arrived in New Orleans two days before Katrina struck having been in the US for a week or two. How could you possibly be touring through the US and not be aware that Katrina was about to strike New Orleans. Don’t you think that that knowledge would have caused Ms Seidel to think, just for a moment…..should I go there?

And then, after she had decided to ignore all warnings and found herelf in an imminent diaster area, did she heed the calls to evacuate?

It appears not.

And, would she, for example, still have mixed feelings about Howard even if he flew over personally and saved her.

I think so.

Husband Andrew Glendinning says

… both the Australian and US governments have been very supportive of his attempts to get them home, but the scale of the devastation has outstripped all contingency plans for the category five storm.

Maybe Fiona and Andrew could have a chat when she gets home about who put her in the bad situation to begin with.

I do of course have pity for her but am still having trouble with this ‘Blame Game’ mentality. All unsavoury outcomes in life can be, it appears, sheeted home to the government.

Whatever happened to adults being responsible for their own decisions or, the fact that sometimes in life you occupy unfortunate time and space and it really isn’t anyones fault.

John Howard clearly needs to lift his game and have DFAT brief him every morning on the million odd Aussies overseas who may, or may not be in danger.

UPDATE: I received an emaill from a reader and post it in it’s entirety.

Having been invloved from the start with the Seidel case, I need to clarify a few points; 1. They arrived on the Saturday, 2 days before the Hurricane. The news they were given by US experts was the Hurricane was NOT going to be a threat to the Gulf Coast 2. They attempted to evacuate, but there were no hire cars nor buses available. The airport had closed by this time 3. Contact with what was happening was through us here in Australia. It was us who had to put pressure on DFAT to actually call Ms Seidel and Ms McLean. They were in a Hotel Room with telephone connection. There is no excuse DFAT took 4 days to finally call them. They had complete details as set out in Smart Traveller, room number, phone number. Yet 2 radio stations here in Australia managed to speak with them on a daily basis. And DFAT’s Excuse is…?????

So when 2 young ladies have seen and experienced what they had, and were rescued by a Sheriff from another county, what do you think they are to say of our own government? Oh, and was there a DFAT official at the airport to meet them when they returned? What do you think?

I would actually expect a sherriff from the host country to rescue them…how the hell could Australian authorities do so. I think the young ladies had an unreal expectation of what their country could or should do for them in the first couple of days. The readers says DFAT were phoned exhorting them to phone the ladies – to what end? They, like the officials of every other country with nationals in the disaster area, couldn’t do anything until the US had control of the situation.

I was overseas in Vietnam when the Tsunami struck and returned home in a plane full of victims. They were suffering minor injuries and were processed, very efficiently I thought, on landing at Brisbane by authorities including DFAT. I can’t see how DFAT would change their protocols in a matter of months so can only assume as the young ladies weren’t injured there was no welcome. I wasn’t welcomed (other than by my family) and didn’t expect to be – there was nothing wrong with me.

I cannot begin to imagine how any US Expert could say, on Saturday, that Katrina was not going to be a threat but in light of the apparent confusion/ineptitude and politicking I can almost believe it but suggest the expert may have been less than informed . Sat was the day when evacuations were ordered and Katrina was predicted as having a 45% chance of hitting NO as a cat 4 or 5 blow.

I repeat, I do feel sorry for the young ladies but the blame game is not the answer and I think it’s a long bow to draw to sheet the blame home to Howard. So long that I think a ‘pre-trauma don’t like Howard’ syndrome existed.

I believe the reader believes the events happened as he states but each of us view such events from a different perspective with some expecting all and others doing all they can for themselves.

I certainly wouldn’t think to blame Howard for my location in a given disaster area for some days. I would look at other aspects.

But then I’m not a young lady.

1 2 3 4