Latest Posts

Shoot to Kill ‘red herring’ gets too much oxygen

Shoot to kill is an emotive issue after the UK Police killed an innocent man acting guilty subsequent to the London bombings. Todays Australian lists the arguements
“We are not giving police the right to kill somebody who is escaping preventative detention,” Mr Howard said. “We are merely saying that if there is a risk to somebody else’s life or bodily injury and there is no other way, they can use deadly force.” The Prime Minister said the changes were important in allowing police to be certain about their legal osition.
But state premiers and other critics of John Howard’s draft anti-terror legislation yesterday said the Prime Minister was wrong to say it merely replicated these existing “shoot-to-kill” powers. The debate boils down to whether police will be allowed to use lethal force against individuals who, although not suspected of criminal offences, are still sought for preventative detention under the anti-terror laws.
Law Council president John North said Mr Howard’s laws created “a new class of person” who police would be able to detain without sufficient evidence to charge with an offence.
That is irelevant. It doesn’t matter what the person is being detained for or whether the police have any evidence. What does matter is whether he draws a gun and decide to shoot it out. Let’s face it, ordinary crims have been known to draw weapons and kill police while being questioned over trivial traffic offences. Are terrorists going to act any different? There is a chance they wont. The Australian editorial has some advice… Terrorism, not police powers, is the issue that matters
OPPONENTS of the proposed anti-terror legislation should get a grip, because the debate on how to protect Australia against attack is being lost in hyperbole and hysteria.
….and highlights the ABC’s political stance.
On Wednesday night on ABC TV’s Lateline program, host Tony Jones tried to enlist Steve Bracks and Peter Beattie as opponents of the proposed laws, particularly the possibility of police shooting to kill terror suspects.
Not surprised I note that SBS are screening a “Look how wonderfull and inventive Muslims are” show soon and was reminded of a post by Zoe Brain who linked to a website extolling Islam’s virtues. She headlined the post” The Heyday of Islamic Science Appears to have ended in the 13th Century“. What is SBS’s agenda in this issue? Some balance is fine but Zoe’s comments are relevant. Progress halted in the Middle East when the Mullahs gained supremacy and while they marked time the West advanced. The luvvies who watch SBS and believe everything will walk away from the lounge all imbued with wonder for the Islamic world. I bet that at no time will the show highlight the dearth of science that has troubled the Middle East for several hundred years.

Another of life’s mystery solved

I live in a suburb where I was told the streets were named after Pacific islands. I live on Tupia Street and have wondered about the origin of the name for some 30 years. I hate unsolved mysteries as I had never heard of a Tupia Island but it turns out some of the streets are named after Pacific Islanders of note, including mine. I recently won a book on ebay by Alan Moorhead, The Fatal Impact, where he details the impact of Western civilization, in the form of one James Cook amongst others, on the islanders.
As Cook was making his plans for departure from Tahiti he was beseiged by Tahitians who wanted to sail with him and at length he agreed to “take a chief and a priest” named Tupia who would be useful as an interpreter and as a guide on the other islands. Tupia was allowed to bring with him a servant, a boy named Tayeto
Eureka! I have found out the source of the name, I thought. It turned out that the ships crew thought highly of Tayeto and little of Tupia as John Marra, one of the crew, remarks;
Tupia was, he says, ” a man of real genius, a priest of the first order and an excellent artist; he was, however, by no means beloved by the Endeavours crew, being looked upon as proud and austere, extorting homage, which the sailors, who thought themselves degraded by bending to an Indian, where very unwilling to pay; and preferring complaints against them on the most trivial occassion. On the contrary his boy, Tayeto, was the darling of the ships company from the highest to the lowest, being of a mild and docile disposition, ready to do any kind of office for the meanest in the ship, and never complaining but always pleased.”
236 years later I live on a street named Tupia. Maybe I should petition the Brisbane City Council to rename it Tayeta Street. Ahh…the joys of reading and the pleasures and knowledge it brings.

Blabbermouth Stanhope

Steve Lewis puts himself firmly in the human rights-activist camp as he suggests we impede the progress of laws that will help protect our citizens. He opens his article with support for Jon Stanhope.
ACT Chief Minister Jon Stanhope should be applauded, not condemned, for publishing a draft of the Howard Government’s anti-terrorism legislation. It is the Government, operating in undue secrecy, that is corrupting the parliamentary process.
Rubbish. ACT Citizens should be glad I’m not Prime Minister. If I were they would all exist in an ignorant state as no way would I ever allow Stanhope access to confidential material. Ever. It’s not that Australians aren’t entitled to be informed – they are. It’s just that a government or even a corporation are entitled to set up planning papers and discuss them internally before arriving at a position that they then submit to public discussion. The fact that all the other Labour State leaders are generally supportive of the issues raised in the discussion paper/draft bill puts Stanhope squarely in the loopy left human rights/activists camp. Lewis goes on;
For heaven’s sake, jail terms of up to seven years can be served on those who advocate causes linked to terror attacks. It is critical they receive more than cursory examination by the Senate.
Why? Jail terms of up to seven years for aiding and abetting the terrorist mass-murderers seems fine to me but he suggests Howard should allow greater Senate procrastination of the kind we had in the previous Government. You recall all the Labour/Democrat/Green ideological based Senate enquiries that only served to hamper progress and act as a Howard bashing base. This country has long needed a law that contains and neutralizes those who would act in support of others killing Australians. During the Vietnam war there were Australians who gave Russia and the North Vietnamese money and moral support that better enabled them to kill Australian soldiers. Who would argue that they shouldn’t have been taken out of circulation? The country and the Senate know by now that we need to take some drastic measures. Our citizens are being slaughtered and we don’t need a Senate enquiry to slow down the implimentation of laws that help stem the flow of blood. Lewis suggests democracy was
… traduced last Thursday as the Government, using its Senate majority, sought to trample the democratic process.
As I understand it the government’s Senate majority was as a result of a general election. The electorate gave the Government a majority so I find some difficulty seeing how the use of that majority tramples democracy. With Australians dying now I want the bill passed now and the system enpowered to act in our interests. If it isn’t passed soon we will have the macabre situation where more Australians are murdered half way through a Senate enquiry – something the bill may have stopped. Let’s get on with it.

Snake Killer Hunted

Sunshine Coast lawn bowlers have closed ranks to protect an elderly man accused of killing a brown snake during a bowls tournament at the Kawana Waters club last week. Brown Snake Fifty percent of all deaths from snakebite in Australia involve the Brown snake. They have venom which can cause death to humans relatively quickly if left untreated. Brown snakes up to 2.3 metres have been recorded in Australia. Then there is the King Brown….yep, it’s a whole lot worse. I’m with the old guy. How times change. When I was young and on the farm, the arrival of a snake was a bugle call for all the men to gather, hunt it down and kill it. To the best of my memory all snakes in the south west of West Australia were poisonous, but even if they weren’t they were still hunted down. In the small timber and farming community of Pemberton the men reasoned any snake left alive could one day kill a woman or child and they just weren’t taking the risk. Years later I was an NCO instructor at the famous, or infamous (depending on whether you were an instructor or student) Jungle Training Centre at Canungra, Queensland, and when teaching patrolling would stop and kill any snake I came across, including Carpet snakes. I don’t discriminate..if your are long and legless, you’re dead! I recall telling my Captain about a Carpet snake I killed one particular day and he went off his head. Protected species…harmless to humans…I’ll charge you if you do it again. Hmm…city boy, I thought, as somewhat miffed, I hastily departed the scene . The next morning the local Courier Mail, with terrific timing, carried an article about a farmer in Far North Queensland who kept a carpet snake in his barn to keep the mice down. The snake had done such a good job that there were no mice left so he went further afield for food. To the homestead, in fact. The farmer was woken by the screams of his 6 year old son who was stressed out at seeing his leg being swallowed by the ten foot snake. I cut out the article, requested an audience with Captain City Boy, politely placed the evidence for the defence on his desk without comment…saluted smartly and withdrew. My Dad always said never smirk in front of the defeated foe.

Comments at Web Diary

Most readers would be aware that I don’t comment often but sometimes restraint dissolves and I feel compelled to throw in my two bobs worth. Bryan Law, Phil Moffat and Micheal De Angelos are the cause of said dissolution of restraint. I responded here and here They should all be hyperventialting by evening but alas, I have to forgo the pleasure and go do some work. I look forward to this evenings late read. UPDATE: Sigh! No one at Margo’s seemed to understand what I was saying. Never mind.

Bush and God

A letter in todays Australian
If Bush was on a mission from God to invade Afghanistan and Iraq, does that follow that he evolved from Intelligent Design? H.Casson Foster, Vic
Not at all, H.Casson but it does follow that you didn’t. Some people will believe anything so long as it is based on the premise that Bush is stupid. If you don’t question the motives of the BBC in posting such a story then you can hardly claim your brain is designed, let alone intelligently. A translation of a translation quoted from Palestinian sources….yeah I can believe that. Like hell.

The Key is Education

To follow up my thoughts that education is the key to the terrorist problem Maj K has a post on the problems of trying to teach the Iraq military how to soldier.
Iraq is a third world country. While this is not a surprising fact to most people, it seems as if this little fact is lost on too many people with access to microphones. It was a third world country before the 1991 Gulf War. It was a third world country before Saddam was removed from power. It will likely remain that way for some time to come. Evolving out of the “third world” category is not a rapid process. It involves much more than merely economics. It also involves, culture, rule of law and widespread education.
Go read and start to understand some of the problems. Read the comments – there is some wisdom there as well.

Boy Killed, 4WDs blamed

THE death of a 3-year-old boy, killed by a modified 4WD on an ordinary suburban street, has prompted calls from road safety experts for an immediate ban on the vehicles. The death is tragic and the News.com article stupid and misleading.
There is no suggestion the driver of the 4WD did anything wrong, police have laid no charges, and the boy ran in front of the traffic.
So the journalist leads with “Calls to ban ‘killer’ 4WDs”. This has no relevance until I read “Calls to ban Trucks” or “Calls to ban Holden utes” or “Calls to ban Camrys” after similar incidents. Doesn’t happen though. Road Safety Experts quoted turns out to be one Monash Uni Lecturer.
President of the Australasian College of Road Safety, Associate Professor Raphael Grzebieta, said driving a raised 4WD was akin to driving a small truck or piece of machinery.
The you should be calling for a ban on light trucks as well. Why don’t you, Raphael?
“You can’t see anyone underneath you when they are close to the vehicle and they have their blindspots like small trucks and machinery,” the Monash University civil engineering lecturer said.
So do some cars, mate. Raphael Grzebieta has a bee in his bonnet about 4WDs with jacked up suspension and the journalist, Lillian Saleh, has used this to get her article carried. Poor reporting in my book.

The Hijab

I recently posted on the To wear or not to wear a hijab and received a comment from a woman who does wear one. Her comments are from the coal face and thus worth reposting on this coal face.
Hi Kev, Just a minor correction: the spelling is “Muslim� for a believing servant who follows the religion of Islam. Also, please note that the majority of terrorist attacks are performed by the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka. Tamil Tigers are certainly not Muslim yet are generally Hindu. In relation to the wearing of the headscarf, people can perceive it as they like. When I leave the house wearing my ‘hijab’ (and yes I choose to wear it!), I am letting everyone know that “hey I am a Muslim�. Nothing more, nothing less. People can draw their own opinions on me, discuss how they feel sorry for me, discuss how “hot� I must get in summer, etc. The bottom line is Kev, it is a requirement in our religion, and despite all secondary reasons about modesty, we believe as Muslims, that God has requested this for all pious women. Don’t forget that Orthodox Jewish women cover their hair (often donning wigs instead), and also Christian nuns wear head coverings. Mary mother of Jesus also covered her hair (just look at any painting or statue!). I recently travelled to Europe and viewed first hand many old paintings by which women wear covering their hair. And sure, as you said, people often change and “assimilate� after generations. In Australia, with the rush of Muslim migrants, you can already note that many Muslims are losing their religion (hence many women are no longer are wearing the hijab that identifies them as Muslims). But they are still Muslim. We all want to live together in peace. It is just a small group of so-called Muslims that make it hard for the rest of us. And Kev, I do despise the actions of some of my extremist brethren. They are disgusting. They should never associate their actions with Islam or being a so-called Muslim. VN
I replied
VN Thanks for commenting. Muslem was a typo as I spelt it correctly eight times in the body of the post. Still, it’s bad editing and I apologize. You’re right about not all terrorism being instigated by muslims. The Tamil Tigers are still active but an unfortunate fact of life is that as they don’t attack us they slip below the radar. I do have a friend who is the last of her line courtesy the Tamils. Her parents and brother were slaughtered on the alter of extremism. On your wearing the hijab. It is your choice and I have no problem with that but while it becomes a public debate then some thought and comment from people outside the religion is reasonable. I’m not sure that the muslim woman who decide not to wear the hijab are neccessarily losing their religion. I’m of the opinion that religion needs to move with the times to reflect changing society and maybe they are simply adjusting their dress standards for this reason. It is common for people coming into a new society to change to the dominant norms. When in Rome…. You quote Nuns and Mary, mother of Jesus, as doing similar but the Nuns, in Australia at least, no longer wear habit, let alone a veil and I suggest if Mary were alive today her dress may be more in tune with todays society than one that prevailed two thousand years ago. I was closely involved with the arrival of Greek and Italian peoples coming to Australia after WW2 – my parents even sponsored some. Their matriarchs dressed as they had for centuries in the rural areas of Italy and Greece but view thier grand daughters today…little Miss Aussies all of them. You are obviously educated and confident so do as you believe and do so with my blessing (as if that matters) but watch your daughters and their daughters and tell me in years hence that it isn’t so. Having said all that I still believe there are woman who wear the hijab, not for the most noble of reasons, but for the most ignoble – subjugation. I note that you despise the actions of some of your extremist brethren and can only suggest you do more of what you have done here. Say it often in a public arena and tell your friends to do like wise. It is calming on a troubled day. God bless
1 159 160 161 162 163 228